Sunday, November 29, 2009

Luke Helton

Kids should not be able to read all of the books that people publish because some of it should just be for adults to read. Like ones with vampires in it. Because some books can be inappropriate or to violent for little kids. But sometimes the violent stuff makes it interesting for older boys and love for older girls. That is what I think about this subject.

Luke Heltons Book

I am reading a book about a kid named Andre who likes to play basketball with his friend named Shawn who is on the opposite team of him. Andre had the ball and was going down the field to make the winning point. Shawn was the only blocker in Andre’s way to winning the game for them. They crashed and the basketball was spinning around the rim and it went in for the game point. Then Andre and Shawn walked off to Andre’s car to go to Shawn’s house where Shawn’s mom was making meatloaf for dinner. That is as far as I have read so far.

Friday, November 20, 2009

abner cermeno

Kids shuld not be able to see any bad things on the web, t.v,or books beacause, there is to many bad things and they can get to violent. they can also get in gangs and they can commit to drugs. some kids are bad because books. I know books are sopuused to help you get more smart but there are diferent types. There are some books that talk about violence and how it get you power. When kids read that stuff they get intrested in it and they want to copie what they hear or see. Kids also like to impressthere frends and they can do what there frend want also beacause of prearpressure and they need to get used to the prearpressure and not get in it

Edgar's Persuasive Paragraph

Students should have the freedom to read anything they want. This is true because if students have a large quantity or variety then they could be intrested in what the read. Another reason is that nowadays kids face difficult issues such as racism or violence so if they see these issues in books as well then they will feel less alone. The last reason that I and many others believe kids should have the freedom to read anything they want is because the first amendment protects and allows them the right to read anything they want.

christian s summary of slam

in slam greg harris ( also known as slam ) is not doing well in school.greg doesn't have great grades and he is failing. he loves to play basket ball. he isn't the best at school or at basketball but he is one of the best players on his team. he also has a big temper that is sometimes is hard to control.

Manuel

Manuel's chapter 3 paragrph
In chapter 3 ther are a lot of bad stuff hapening.
First of all no body was doing ther part. The only
pearsons that whear working whear Ralph Simon
piggy and Jack. Also Simon dosent know what to
do. He did't know if he should go in Ralph's team
or Jack's team. But he really did't new what to do
so he trid to help both but he was doing evrything
wrong because he was traing to help both

Julia

Should Students Have the Freedom to Read Anything They Want

I think that students should have the freedom to read anything they want. What I mean by that is that they can read books that makes reading interesting for the kids. If kids dont get to choose what they want to read, after a while they will get board and just stop reading. If they stop reading it can be bad in many ways. They could lose all their imagination and be alone all the time. That is why I think that students should have the freedom to read anything they want.

nathaniel martinez CHART


trever freeby

In the first chapter Jefferson a 21 year old African American is caught at a robbery with three dead people. He is put on trial. his layer doesn't view him as a man in fact he say "i would just as fast put a hog in the electric chair." he is found guilty by his jury and is sentenced to death by the electric chair. In the second chapter an African American school teacher named grant who knows the god mother of Jefferson go's home to see his aunt.

Christian Dillon--Final

Children should be limited to watching TV violence. Watching a single episode can increase aggressiveness. Kids with emotional, behavioral, etc. problems are affected more with TV violence. Some kids are immune/numb to the violence on TV, so it doesn't affect them.

Watching a single TV episode can increase aggressiveness. For example hundreds of studies show that kids and teens imitate the violence they see on TV. Also when affected the kids/teens can afeect other kids and increse violence by thirty-minutes of TV.

Kids choose violence to solve problems. Also there hundreds of studies that there are two other similar acts like become immune to violence and imitate violence.

Kids with emotional, behavioral etc. problems are affected more with TV violence. Studies show that the impact on these kids/teens immediately or years in the future.

A way that kids and teen can watch violence is The First Amendment to have a freedom of speech. However The First Amendment cannot cover the actions that the kids and teens do.

Adrian essay

Students should have the freedom to read anything they wont.Kids will have more freedom hey dont ban books if.Kids also face tough issues and could not feel.alone.By realting to the book.Kids feel more.commortible.If they dont feel alone.So I think kids should not have a reading limit.

Emily V.


kikikiki

Erique Franco

i think kids should not be able to watch/read what ever they want because they might be too young to watch it and it might dramma ties them because there minds might not be ready to watch it because of the kind of violence it has in it. a good example is like makeing a 5 year old watch saw. I also think if a little kid watches violence on T.V. they might want to do the things they watch on t.v or read in a book they werent suppose to read because they think its cool.In conclusion i think children and there parents should make the right decision on what is appropriate to let there kids watch or read

Julia

A Lesson Before Dying Summary

I am reading the book A Lesson Before Dying and i'm on chapter 5. This book is about this kid named Jefferson who is going to go to jail for a crime he did not commit. The joury sentenced Jefferson to death by electricution. His Aunt and his other Aunt Emma want Grant, their nephew, to go talk to Jefferson to make him a man. They want Grant to talk to Jefferson because in court all anybody was saying to Jefferson was that he was not a man. That made his Aunts very sad and that is why they want Grant to go talk to him. Even though Grant dosent want to talk to Jefferson his Aunts are making him go talk Henri Pichot. They are going to talk to Henri because his brother is the sheriff. The only reason they are going to talk to him is one his aunts worked for Henri for along time and thought he would help him and two like i said before his brother is the sheriff. When they got home he went to Beyonne to go to the Rainbow club with vivian to talk about moving to Baton Rouge. She told him she couldn't right now but when her divorce was final they would. That is as far as I got in A lesson Before Dying.

Christian Dillon--Jesse

Jesse is a seventeen year old boy, living with his and has a problem with his dad, for example, Jesse and his dad were fighting about how long Jesse's hair is. However his brother, Abel has longer hair than Jesse. Later on in the story Jesse drops out of high school to go live with his brother Abel. Both of them enroll into Fresno City College. Abel and Jesse get ninety dollars a month to pay for there rent, food, and other supplies. Jesse and his brother go to on a Labor Bus to go farming every weekend and earn sixteen dollars.

Victoria

Jefferson is going to be killed by a crime. His granmother tries to have on track. He helps out in the camunatie.He wants to go away with his girlfriend,but she cant because she is not divorced yet.

ESMERALDA ESSAY SHOULD KIDS READ WHAT EVER THEY WHANT

Should kids be aloud to read what ever they want? I think no, because they can get a lot of stuff bad and horrible. The thing about the books is they can say getting in gangs and drugs that can kill you.The book can talk about sexual stuff like getting pregnant and leave family . The other thing you can get in a gang and drugs and drugs can kill you.

Now they say that the books can be seen to kids and young adults. the books can effect kids and there parents life. Now the thing is that some books can be good like the siers of twilight. The other books are to teach you some thing about the life or the turth . The Truth can tell edvice or good ideas.


BY. ESMERALDA

Courtlands Book reading perswassive essay

Students should have the freedom to read anything they want. Student will be more interested in Reading book about people who have problem like they do.Kids need to read books about this so they wont fell alone in the world.Books that have violence will make some kids try to do those stupid things in the book.But in books like twilight,harry potter,To kill a mocking bird,and the outsiders there is yes violence but stuff like that most kids like reading that sort of stuff.i think all kids should be able to read want they want.

should books be censored?julian

I think that students should be able to read what they want they will have to learn it someday anyways.there are 3 reasons i will talk about in this essay 1 is they will learn it sometime,2 is how they like to read books that are possibly going to be cesored,and 3 not all books should be censored.

sarina

For the limits it really depends on what they are reading or whatching and how old they are.If they are old enough to whatch it then it doesnt matter.If they arent then they shouldnt be whatching it.Also if they do not want to watch that which most kids dont then they wont but the older kids that want to should be able to.

Victoria

Students should not the freedom to read anything they want. They would get the bad idea. Lots of people get ride of book, but you don't want to get ride of all the books.There are kids how are mature for some books that have some violence.If you take away lots of books kids will probably not want to read at all. They want to be open to books that have there taste.

Rodrigo

Students should have the freedom to read anything they want.

I think that students should have the freedom to read anything they want because that way kids will be more interested in books and maybe there spelling could be better and their vocabulary might be better.That way when they are going to do a speech or say something they could use strong vocabulary because of their reading.If students keep reading the books that they want they could relate to them because of there issues at home. Also it could help kids read fluently.When students need help on vocabulary it could help them learn vocbulary.

trever freeby

I think kids should be able to read whatever they want except for a few exceptions and limits. I think parents should help their kids decide if what their kids are reading is appropriate. The government shouldn't censure what children should read. Obvious limits are giving children adult books or books that promote drug use and racism. Books that are just about gore and violence shouldn't be given to children. In conclusion i think children and their parents should make their own decisions on what is appropriate to read.

summary brittany

I read that a man named jefferson is going to be killed for being at a crime scene that he was at and not a part of.His godmother miss emma wants grant to make him into a man before he has to sit in an eletric chair and be killed.he works at a school and wants to move away with his girlfriend just to get away and she wants to wait so he can finish what miss emma asked of him.

Lesson Before Dying Summary Illianna

In a Lesson Before Dying Jefferson is being sentenced to die. So far the death date has been sentenced and Jefferson thinks himself a hog. Grant doesn't want to go see Jefferson anymore, and Miss Emma, Tante Lou want him to. When Grant visited Jefferson last time he bought him a radio to listen to. Jefferson really liked that but Miss Emma and the Reverand say that it's sin music and they want to save his soul instead. They want God to be with him intsead of sinful music.

persuasive paragraph brittany

Students should have the freedom to read anything they want to.People should allow children to read whatever they want want to read.It allows a bigger selection of books to children.An example is if a ten or eleven year old and they wanted to read harry potter or twilight they could read it but they couldn't because it would be censored.People shouldn't limit the the variety of books children could read more with a bigger selection of books that would be better than band books.

Should books be censored? Illianna

Kids should have the freedom to read anything they want. Censoring books violates civil rights and kids should be allowed to have civil rights too. We need to promote all kinds of books so that kids will read. Today most kids say reading and books are boring. They are mostly interested in video games, tv, and the internet. If books are censored then kids will have less of a variety to read. Technology is taking over and reading is becoming less popular. Books should not be censored.

Work required

Everyone:
Persuasive paragraph about limiting what kids read

6th Table (6X6) from stories we have read

7th Summary of chapters read (Lesson Beforee..., Hoopsters)
or table about stories from House on Mango Street (House on Mango Street, Hair, My Name, Four Skinny Trees, Marin)

8th Summary form the chapters you have read

cassandra

Persuasive paragraph
Students should have the freedom to read anything they want. Kids will be more interested in reading if they had a choice in what they read. Sometimes kids read from a textbook throughout the day, and want to have a chance to read what they want. Kids face tough issues. By talking about those issues it will help them not feel alone. Also by reading about it, it can help them to do something about what ever is going on. To talk to someone about it. The first amendment protects the freedom of speech, as long as its not dangerous. Kids should be able to read what they want but in reason. Also depending on the age level. Some material may not be apporpriate. I think that students should have the freedom to read anything they want.

Alexia

Perssuasive Paragraph
Students should have the freedom to read anything they want. If kids get to have the freedom, to read waht they want they will be more intrested in reading. They will have choices. Kids go through hard issues sometimes. When books talk about issues like racism or violence kid's wont feel alone. People say certain books can give kids bad ideas. I wouldn't even be reading books that aren't appropriate. The first amendmant talks about the freedom of speech. Kids should read what they want, but still be appropriate.

joshua books that young people can read

Should students be able to read watever they want? No because it might be to violent. Kids should only be able to read kid books. for example kids shoudent read twilight. Kids should read books like Arthur.

Kids shoudent read scary books because they might have nightmares. Kids can get realy scared of books. Kids can be fun and cool.

nazaria should kids read anything they want

I think kids are aloud to read any book they want if like then they should read it if the don't like it then hey don't have to read it.I also there should be an age limit to read the book and if kids read like at a 8th grader than they can read that level book.Some books give bad ideas and those book should not be read.Some books we need to read people buy book to read and authors they write to get famous and how con the get famous.Some book are so good they make them into a movie like twilight saga,Charlie and the chocolate factory.No books should be jugde by its cover.

Selene

No, kid's should not read anybook they want . They should not because some books can give kid's bad ideas and at the same time it's inappropriate for them.
In books there you find some inappropriate language, ideas and bad influences . These inappropriate subjects will give a kid bad influences and will start with bad language that the books gave them.The inappropriate subjects can also contain violence, language, racism horrid ideas. Parents teacher and librariands don't whant kid's reading bad subjects that will afect thei minds at such a young age.

nazaria chart


Thursday, November 19, 2009

Manuel

Manuel's paragraph
Students should have the rigth to read anything they want.
Students will be more intrested in reading if they have more
book choises. Kids have different taste of books. It can also
help kids how ther actions can affect other people. In book's
ther are charecters and one charecter actions can affect another
charecter. Also pople can argue that baning books violets ther civil
rigths. The First Admendment includes fredom of speach. In the
other hand some people belive that children should be protected
from bad issues for example racism or violence. But ther are
diffrent book that kids can read and be protect. In conclusion
I think students should have the rigth to read what ever they
want.

Sam's Essay

Students should have the freedom to read anything they want. Students will be more intrested in what they read, if there is a variety to choose from. Also because kids face tough issues and when books talk about those issues they feel lees alone. Lastly, because the first admendment allows and protects freedom of speech.

Jose Book Essay!

Students should not have freedom to read anything they want. Students should not have access to inappropriate subjects such as sexual education, racism, and anti-family. These kinds of books could hurt young children or give them a bad idea. These books could help kids face tough issues but, could help kids in a bad or inappropriate way. Adults are old enough to access these kinds of books. Children are too young to understand these books and can give kids harmful ideas. There should be age limits for those who want to read a certain book. Students should be protected, not harmed from books that are not meant for kids.

Selene literature chart


Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Equal Rights Timeline Info.

A Timeline of the Struggle for Equal Rights in America


1865

13th Amendment outlaws slavery

1865

Ku Klux Klan (KKK) founded to maintain white supremacy through intimidation and violence

1865

Freedman's Bureau formed during Reconstruction to assist freed slaves in the South

1866

Civil Rights Act grants citizenship to native-born Americans except Indians

1868

14th Amendment grants equal protection of the laws to African Americans

1870

15th Amendment establishes the right of African American males to vote

1875

Civil Rights Act grants equal access to public accommodations

1883

Supreme Court nullifies Civil Rights Act of

1896

Supreme Court validates the principle of "separate but equal" in Plessy v. Ferguson

1905

Niagara Movement founded to fight for school integration, voting rights, and assist African American political candidates, forerunner of the NAACP

1906

Greensburg, Indiana, race riot, the first of many in reaction to African American migration north

1909

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) formed to fight for civil rights through legal action and education

1915

Refounding of the Ku Klux Klan

1920

19th Amendment gives women the right to vote

1924

American Indians granted citizenship and the right to vote

1942

Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) founded to fight for civil rights using nonviolent, direct-action protests

1948

President Harry Truman ends segregation in the U.S. military

1954

In Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the Supreme Court overturns the principle of "separate but equal"

1955

Rosa Parks begins the Montgomery Bus Boycott

1957

President Dwight Eisenhower sends U.S. Army troops to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce the desegregation of schools

1957

Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) founded to coordinate localized southern efforts to fight for civil rights

1960

Sit-in at the F. W. Woolworth lunch counter in Greensboro, February 1

1960

Hundreds of university students stage a sit-in at downtown stores in Nashville, Tennessee, to protest segregated lunch counters

1960

Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) founded to coordinate student-led efforts to end segregation

1960

Civil Rights Act reaffirms voting rights for all Americans

1961

Integrated groups of protesters join Freedom Rides on buses across the South to protest segregation

1963

Hundreds of thousands of Americans take part in the March on Washington to call for racial equality

1964

24th Amendment outlaws poll taxes for national elections

1964

Civil Rights Act outlaws discrimination in public accommodations and by employers

1964

Organization for Afro-American Unity (OAU) formed to promote closer ties between African Americans and Africa

1965

Voting Rights Act nullifies local laws and practices that prevent minorities from voting

1965

Malcolm X assassinated

1968

Martin Luther King, Jr., assassinated

1968

Civil Rights Act outlaws discrimination in the sale or rental of housing

1970

Voting Rights Act of 1965 renewed

Monday, November 9, 2009

Final draft on TV violence by:paul

Violence on TV can affect on kid that watch 3-4 they get violent and aggressive. They should at least control what violence they what on TV some parents/government want to banned violence and the directors say that it’s freedom of speech now in days you cannot go to a movie theater if the ratings don’t say the age that you are. Some movies even have censorship that kids should not even see. Even according to Francis G. an authority on movie censorship and she does not like at all the movies that have censorship. The movies that have censorship and some of them are even banned because they did not allow showing it. So not even in books because any one can read the book.kid tell their parent that if they can watch rated (R) movies that are only 18 years and older. Some movies have mild violence, mild language and in some movies karate guys kick them in the stomach and they copy them and do it on some one else. The government wants’ to stop them but they say that you cannot do noting because it’s freedom of speech is a act that comes withe in someones mind and i that is not right and fair for the censorship people to tolerate that tipe of inapropiate movie/book.And even parent have to take care of there kid on what they are watch on TV and not make them see these tipe of movies on TV and they even say it's freedom of speech.I say we should put a stop on TV violence on what whe watch by the way parents have part of the fault by not correcting them .

By:Paul

mICheaL


michael martinez


Esmeralda jesse


nazaria


Jose Storyboard 2


michael martinez

Drinking and Driving
By: Michael Martinez

What I think is a bad influence o kids, teenagers, would be drinking, or drinking and driving because of the accidents that adults have when drinking then driving in the open road. I also think that drinking should be illegal because of the number showings that comes up for drinking, 90% of people get in car crash’s mostly teenagers shown in drinking and driving. Also shown in a graph people tend to only drink 1 shot of alcohol people still do not get in car crash’s, or when adults are drunk the tend to give their children/teenagers some also.

Jose Jesse Storyboard


Manuel T.V. Violence Essay

Should we limit TV violence? I say we should limit TV violence for many reasons .One of them is that American children watch too much television and a lot of its violence. Also TV can affect kid in many ways. But in the other hand there are many reasons why we shouldn’t limit television violence.
But I steel say we should limit TV violence.

First of all American children watch to much TV violence. American children watch an average of 3 hours to 4 hours a day. A lot of viewing of TV violence courses greater aggressiveness .Kid's who see show's or program's wear violence is really realistic are more likely to do what they see in television. Second of all television can affect kids in many way’s.

Television can be a powerful influence in a kid. Hundreds of studies have found that television
Can affect kids and teens in horrible ways. One of them is that they become numb to the horror of television violence. Another way that can affect them is that they accept violence as a way to solve problems. Also they can imitate what they see in television. But in the other hand there are reasons why we should not limit television violence.

In the other hand it will be hard to limit television violence. The reason it will be hard is because the First Amendment. It is really hard to fight against it because in it there is freedom of speech. But there are limits in the First Amendment. For example there is pg, pg13, R.

In conclusion I say we should limit TV violence.
One of them is that American children watch too much television and a lot of its violence. Also TV can affect kid in many ways. But in the other hand there are many reasons why we shouldn’t limit television violence. In conclusion I say that we should limit TV violence.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

victoria valencia

Why are kids getting so violent? They are getting violent because they are watching violent TV shows and movies.

How do kids get violent? They are getting violent because when they watch certain TV channels or movies that have a lot of violence and stuff like that they tend to act what they see on TV.

Are parent’s part of the problem? They can be part of the conflict like if your parents are divorced and always fighting then you will start to act just like your parents. Adults are also part of the conflict because if they mentally or physically abuse you like hitting or calling you bad names then that will affect your life forever.

Can your TV be affecting you in some way your whole life? Well it depends on what channels you are watching it also depends on how you want to live your life. Kids are easily influenced by the TV. They imitate what they see like punching, kicking, and starting a fight.

Kids are not only violent because of the TV. Kids are violent because they choose to. Kids are not only influenced of the TV they can be influenced by their friends or family. Not everybody has a TV. Kids don’t only watch bad violent TV shows and movies.

johnny revised essay

I think that tv violence has negative impact on kids . because most kids watch 3 to 4 hours of tv everyday. And its mostly younger kids that watch the most tv . And
since they're growing up their thoughts and behaviors are changing.And hundred of studies from universities and colleges say and have proven that violence on tv and in movies is not a good influnece on childrens minds .Because they're maturing and if they see violence everday they get
more aggressive and violent and think they can solve their problems like the people on tv who fight to solve their problems. like if thier somone mean to them they will act like the people on tv like steven segal and bruce lee who break bones and kill people to solve there problems
and eventually they so used to seeing violence everday
that they become numb. so later in life they will not care if they hurt someone and eventually become a bully. and in
conclusion to this most parents if possible should always have parent supervision on children when they are watching tv or movies. and have strict rules to what you allow your children to watch. and if theres anything you can do you to prevent it you should do it.


Julia

Homeless Kids and their Families
(1st Draft)

We should donate money to help the homeless families and their children. We should help them because many homeless kids drop out or get held back a year. We also need to get homeless families and children off the streets so they are not exposed to any kind of danger or violence on the street. Another reason to help them is to help all the homeless families and kids get off the streets and into safe clean homes and get their parents jobs.

Many people argue that homelessness is their own fault and when they give men money they use it wrong. However, most homeless people are kids or whole families.

Homeless kids drop out or get held back. The Seattle Eastside Family Examiners say that “If homeless children are able to make it to school the are more likely to be suspended, drop out or get held back a year.

We need to get homeless families and kids off the streets so they are not exposed to danger or violence on the streets. The Seattle Eastside Family Examiners also say that “Over half of the homeless children are elementary school age, while 42% are under six, and 25% of them have witnessed violence while living on the streets. This could lead the hids to violence and gangs later on in life for them.

We need to help all the homeless families and kids get off the streets and into safe clean homes and get their parents jobs. This could help the children have better lives. The poverty rate in CA has stayed stable at a little bit over 13% between 2002 and 2005 and dropped slightly to 12.2%.

In conclusion we should donate money to help homeless families and their kids because there are so many things we can do like hel prevent them from dropping out of school, and getting them off the streets so they are not exposed to danger or violence. Also because we need to help all the homeless families and their kids off the streets and into safe clean homes and get their parents jobs. So You should go out now and find out what you can do to help homeless families get off the streets!!

Emily V.

I don’t think people should tent their houses for termites. There are alternate ways of killing termites. It also costs a lot. Some people might have enough money.

There are six alternatives to tenting. Somebody can heat them to 120 degrees Farenheight. Somebody can freeze them at -20 degrees Farenheight. Someone can microwave them. You also have the option to use the Sentricon Colony Elimination System, which uses a tiny amount of the kind of poison used in tenting. Shocking (using an electro-gun) and using oil from orange peels works, too.

Tenting costs a lot. The price is about $3,000 give or take. The prices of the alternatives are less than that. The heat treatment costs from $1,250- $2,500. The electro-gun and microwaving costs about $1,150.

Some people might have enough money. Like I said before, the alternatives get rid of termites and keep more money in your pocket. They are also more environmentally friendly.
I don’t think people should tent their houses for termites. There are other ways to get rid of them. Tenting costs a lot. The alternatives are less expensive and more environmentally friendly. So, don’t tent your house!

Friday, November 6, 2009

Frances


Rough Draft.

TV violence is bad for a lot of reasons, one of them is when a child or someone older can watch TV and it has violence they might repeat what they see then someone gets hurt.

Another of my opinions is their are not influenced by TV violence they might have been violent before they even watched violence on TV. The
Producers don’t know if the audience would take it offensively because people think of violence in different ways.

TV violence is invulnerable because a lot of people want violence and the show will get a lot of views and ratings and they won’t cancel the show. Most people think that TV shows and moves now from back then earlier in the years are more violent.

Everyone has different interests and they might allow a lot of violence or they might not allow it but it depends on what it is.

felipe


Emily V.

I need to put my counter argument in a separate paragraph. I also need to make it flow.

♠Ayla Essay

Gum Should Be Allowed In School
Chewing gum in school should be allowed. Chewing gum improves concentration and reduces stress. The United States Military soldiers have been regularly supplied with gum since World War I. Chewing gum helps your brain function. Chewing gum helps you lose weight.

Cassandra-Violence essay

Final
Is tv violence bad? There are different reasons on how tv violence can be affective. Another reason is how much tv is being watched daily. Also parents having a part in that.

Tv violence can be affective to hildren in different ways. Studies have showed effects on what it can do. Children can become immune to it seeing it as alright to do. And accept it is as ways to solve problems. Watching a certain amount can increase the way kids behave.

Tv being watched to much? Children watch an average of 3 to 4 hours of tv. Most of it being of violent shows. It doesn't have to be where you just watch multiple times of violent shows. Violence being very realistic these days causes kids to have a thought in their minds to copy. It could just take one time and kids are influenced.

Parents also have a role in violence. When nothing is being done about whats being watched then theres a problem. They should be in-control of what their kids are watching. And tell them what they see isn't real.

Although watching a lot of violence on tv, that can cause bad behavior. It may just not be the problem. Kids themselves, who may have problems already too. By watching violent shows it could just increase their behavior even more.

Overall, tv violence is bad and affective to children. To much tv being watched causes problems. But remebering that parents have a part in what their kids watch aswell.

why is violence on t.v. is a problem

TV violence should be taken off of t.v. altogether. It can be emotionaly or mentally damaging especially to young kids. The AACP states that kids that watch TV more than those who don't watch any at all, influence is a negative way. TV can be a strong influence but TV violence can be a negative influence on kids.

TV violence can be emotionaly or mentally damaging to kids but especially to younger kids. The evidence that proves is in the article of AACP.

~ ♥ Brielle Final Draft ♥ ~

Final
TV violence should be limited, so kids don't imitate what they see on TV or even in movies. It not just the kid's fault for watching the violence, it's the parent's because they let them watch the violence. Parents need to advise what their child is watching to protect them from the violence.

TV violence needs to be limited. If TV networks could stop showing the violence & inappropriate shows, they can help limit violence with kids. Even if they have to make the violence shows prime time, they should. Kids don't need this influence. When adults watch violence, they know it's not right, but kids are young. They think "Well, it's on TV, so I guess its okay." The truth is, its not.

When kids watch so much violence, they start to get use to seeing it. Since they're seeing innocent people get hurt, after a while they can watch violence without feeling the victim's pain. On shows people sometimes hurt the person to get back at the other person, so kids think violence is the answer to their problems.

Another issue is when kids watch violence, they reenact what they saw. When younger kids watch shows like Power Rangers, they hurt others with some Power Ranger fighting moves. Or when they watch Spiderman, they think people who give them problems should stop bothering them by hurting them. Parents should remind their kids that whats happening during Power Rangers or Spiderman isn't real.

Although, sometimes parent can't control what their child is watching. Sometimes they're at work, so they can't prove that their child was even watching the violence. Another thing is that a show without any violence might have an episode with violence. Sometime parents don't know whats coming. However, parents can stop them from watching the violence by telling their kids they're not allowed to watch those kind of shows & movies. Even if their kid goes to their friend's house to watch a movie, the parent should find out what they're going yo watch to see it's appropriate or not.

In conclusion, parents need to advise what their children are watching. Violence should be limited on TV & movies. If there's anyway to prevent kids from watching violence it should be used.

Christian Dillon--Draft

Children should be limited to watching TV violence. Watching a single episode can increase aggressiveness. Kids with emotional, behavioral, etc. problems are affected more with TV violence. Some kids are immune/numb to the violence on TV, so it doesn't affect them.

Watching a single TV episode can increase aggressiveness. For example hundreds of studies show that kids and teens imitate the violence they see on TV.

Kids choose violence to solve problems. Also there hundreds of studies that there are two other similar acts like become immune to violence and imitate violence.

Kids with emotional, behavioral etc. problems are affected more with TV violence. Studies show that the impact on these kids/teens immediately or years in the future.

A way that kids and teen can watch violence is The First Amendment to have a freedom of speech. However The First Amendment cannot cover the actions that the kids and teens do.

Emily V.

I don't think people should tent their houses for termites. There are alternate ways of killing termites. It also costs a lot. Some might have enough money, But there are other ways of getting rid of them.

There are six alternatives to tenting. Somebody can heat them to 120 degrees Farenheight. Somebody can freeze them at negative 20 degrees Farenheight. Someone can microwave them. You also have the option to use the Sentricon Colony Elimination System, which uses a tiny amount of the kind of poison used in tenting. Shocking and using oil from orange peels works, too.

Tenting costs a lot. The price is about $3,000 give or take. The prices of the alternatives are less than that. The heat treatment costs from $1,250- $2,500. The electro- gun and microwaving costs about $1,150.

I don’t think people should tent their houses for termites. There are other ways to get rid of them. Tenting costs a lot. The alternatives are less expensive and more environmentally friendly. So, don't tent your house.

selene's persuasive essay

Tattoes are not a bad influence because kids aren't thinking about how or what they are going to permanently writte something in their skin. Many parents do have tattoes, but its probably the name of the love of their life; it means something. There is a certain point where people cross the line with what they carve into their skin, and it might be offensive to someone, those are the type that we should keep away from children not the simple name of their mother, tattoed in their fathers arm.
People argue saying that tattoes will lead their children ito gangs and other violence. Studies have been made and discused by arguing that tattoes do not drag under aged kids to gangs. They do not join the gang for a tattoe. A tattoe is not violent it does not drag you violence it is a tattoe.
What use to be an outlaw is now a permanet decoration for a lot of people. It was from hate and violence to love and respect for the lost and forgotten one. The tattoe will bring an end to the hurt and pain from a lost one by having them with you always and forever until the end of your days.

Circle - Jose

Mr. Smith and I were sitting talking about dumb explore thingy? Then Nazaria came and said she was missing her four papers. Mr S. got up and looked for the four papers while I sat down and did noting. So we couldn't find her papers so we interview her of her stress she was going threw. So we interview her CNN way because she wouldn't let us see her face! Later on Nazaria found her papers and we couldn't interview her CNN way even thought I really wanted too.

So what the heck is up with parents? Parents are to dumb to see that were having CHILDHOOD STRESS! Parents have to work and pay bills and do boring stuff like that! So think we don't have stress. Well I really want to beat my parents up but I can't! So they interview me CNN way and I said," Parents! We children are going threw stress. Academic and social pressure OK! So parents your not the only one! Thank you for your time."

Your at your ugly table eating rice beacause your HUNGRY! So your all alone doing noting and staring at your white rice. Then you hear something you never herd! You hear your parents yell at each other. You think for a minute or an 1 hour or maybe 100 hours. Then you listen and hear," Stew! You know we need that money!" So you act like a horse when they come downstairs! You eat your rice like a pig and watch how your parents don't talk to each other. You sigh and say," Maybe that's how i'm going." Then you eat your rice and paly some PSP!

The homework attack! Run for you life! The school is eating children and making them work all night and day! Yes you start running and hide behind a tree while the walking eating school passes you. To much work no time to play! Many kids are dieing out of TOO MUCH HOMEWORK! Kids want to play someday intead of doing homework! I mean really you should play some day intead of sitting down and be slave for your mom! We play that's how we learn and suppose to DO! So teachers don't be a ruler and give us a break!

Exploere - Jose

Alexia

Tv Violence Essay-Final

There's different reason's for Tv violence. One reason for Tv violence is it's sometimes not appropriate. Another reason for Tv violence is kids might imitate what they see, on Tv.

Tv violence isn't always appropriate. Tv violence can be powerful on kids, when they watch it andit can affect their behavior. A lot of today's Tv shows have violence. Kids that watch the violence get use to seeing it, and don't really care after a while.

Kids might use the Tv violence. Kids take the violence as a way to solve thier problems. Tv violence can cause kids to aggressive to other people. And kids will copy what they see on Tv.

Tv violence isn't always bad. It teaches them what can happen. Parents can tell their kids, that the violence on the show the characters are just acting.

There's different reasons for Tv violence. One reason for Tv violence is it's not alway's appropriate for kids. Another reason for Tv violence is kids might use the violence. These are the reasons for Tv violence.

sarina essay

Sarina Scott

Water Conservation

The lack of water conservation is one of the for most underlined reasons for the earth. Most reasons are because of extra uses of water that does not need to be used as often as they are.

One of the reasons is because people are watering there lawn too much and too often. Robert E. Lee says “your lawn only needs to be watered once a day either in the night or morning time to minimize evaporation.


An idea to start saving water could be to raise the water bill price. Most people will disagree because they do not have enough money. I agree though because if you do not have the money then you won’t waste the water.

Another problem is the leaks in our house. Many people have leaks in there house, like a sink. When the leaking you can hear it o you turn it off. Other people have leaks outside, such as a hose or pool. You usually can not hear them, but when you do see you either turn it off or call some one to fix it.
A big reason for loss of water is showers. Just by shortening your shower by two minutes you can save up to 150 gallons of water per month. Most adults will say that they have had a long day and they need to relax and take a shower but, that is not true showers can be just as helpful when they are short.

Conserving water would really help the environment to save water. These ideas should help us all in different ways.

Rodrigo's Essay

Should families have a dog?

I think families should have a dog because they can protect you. They are also man's (or woman's) best friend. If you have kids the dog could play with them because most of the dogs like kids of any ages. Dogs are really smart. Fireman have dogs because they could save persons. Also if you are sad your dog will lick you to make you happy. The dog will like to play with you a lot and most of the time.

Dogs could take away a lot of your time because you have to take him out. You will have to take him to the veterinary once on a while. You will have to buy the dog a bed,blanket,a dog house, food and some toys. Every single day you will have to take out the dog. You will have to train him if you want the dog to be inside the house and that will take some time. You will have to pay a lot of attention.

I still think families should have a dog

Manuel's last draft of persuasive

Should we limit tv violence?I say we shuld limit tv violence for many reasons .
One of them is that american children whatch to much television and a lot of it's
violence.But in the other hand ther are many reasons why we should't limit television violence .But I steel say we should limit tv violence.

First of all american children watch to much tv violence.American children
watch an average of 3 hours to 4 hours a day.A lot of viewing of tv violence couses
greater aggressiveness.Kid's who see show's or program's whear






Victoria De Anda eassy

"Do you like chocolate or candy"? Hear you will read about good and ad things about chocolate and candy. When you finsh reading you will see if you like chocolate or candy.

Candy has all the flavors you can think of. You can lick, bite, or chew and it lives no pices behin. It's very sweet and wont have to worry about taking your time and take the stuff of your teeth.

Chocolate is very tasty. Some of it stays in your mought and still taste it. It melts in your mought and you don't have to worry about ithing and bithing untill your teeth fall of.

Chocolate has a less veraiety then candy for example: whit chocolate, dark chocolate, milck chocolate, and chocolate with filling like caramell.Chocolate leaves pices behind in your teeth and has more calories.

Candy is very hared and leaves caviethys on your teeth. When you suck on one it slowly disolves in your mought. It's also very sticky and when you unrape it somtimes the raper sticks on your candy.

Both sweets have many diffrences, but falls undder cadagory or diserts.

Illianna Whaling essay

Draft:

While whaling is a big part of Japanese culture, they kill around 1,000 whales a year. Japan shouldn't allow whaling in their country because whales will become extinct. In time if whaling continues, whales will become extinct and this can affect the food chain. It will also increase global warming. Whaling is uncalled for and unnecessary.

The extinction of whales would be a tragedy because many cultures venerate whales. Whale stories are recited all around the world. Whale's mean a lot to people and their cultures. Whale's are also the largest mammals on this planet, for them to become extinct would be a horrible reflection on humanity. Japan's research program kills around 1,000 whales a year, they say for research. But the excess whale meat is being turned into dog food and served in Japanese restaurants.

The decrease of whale population will affect the food chain. Many other animals will be affected by the extinction of whales, including humans. Does Japan want to be responsible for whales and many other animals to become extinct?

Global warming also affects the decrease of whale population. Ensuring healthy whale populations is critical to restoring the health of the world's oceans. If the Japanese continue whaling then whales will soon become extinct, causing global warming to increase. The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IAW) is opposed to all forms of commercial whaling because they say its cruel, unnecessary because it meets no pressing human need, and poses threat to the survival of the world's remaining whales. Does Japan want to contribute to global warming, and the extinction of whales?

Japan asks if whaling is really any different than us killing cows for hamburger meat. Well cows are not close to becoming extinct. Cows let out a gas called methane, which increases global warming. So by humans eating cows, we are helping to reduce global warming. Cows are also over populated, so we are helping to reduce the population. Whaling is reducing the population to the point of extinction.

Whaling is uncalled for and unnecessary because the whales will soon become extinct, the people who venerate whales and recite whale stories will no longer have pictures of whales, the food chain will be affected , and global warming will increase. Japan should stop whaling in their country!


Revision plan:
1. fix intro sentences
2. Fix repetition
3. Get more evidence
4. Fix arguments


Whaling
By Illianna Gonzalez-Soto

Whaling is a big part of Japanese culture; they kill around one thousand whales a year. Whaling trips affect and increase global warming while hunting whales for research and human and animal consumption. In time, the increasing loss of the whale population will result in extinction.
The extinction of whales would be a tragedy because many cultures venerate whales. Whale stories are recited all around the world. If whales become extinct than all whales will be are stories. Many people won’t be able to imagine whales and all whales will be is a piece of paper with a picture on it, or words coming from a person’s mouth. Whales mean a lot to people and people want to go see them. If whales become extinct then no one will be able to see them live ever again.
Many other animals will be affected by the extinction of whales. One of these would be krill. Krill are some of the fish that whales eat. If the whale population lowers, then the krill population will increase, and eventually become too big. We do not want the food chain to be thrown off!!
Whaling also affects global warming. All the chemicals coming from the ships that are used for whaling is traveling up into space and making the o-zone layer get bigger! The trips are unnecessary and they contribute to global warming. Japan shouldn't’t allow whaling in their country!
Japan asks if whaling is any different than us killing cows for hamburger meat. Japan’s research program kills around 1,000 whales a year, for research. But the excess whale meat produced during “research” is being turned into dog food, and served in Japanese restaurants. Whales weren’t made for eating or for being fed to dogs, but cows were made for feeding everyone. So yes killing cows is different than killing whales. Cows are made for human consumption, but whales aren’t.
If whaling continues than whales will soon become extinct, people who venerate whales will only have words to remember whales by, the food chain will be affected, and global warming will increase. For all these reasons, Japan should put an end to whaling in their country. Whales are the largest mammal on Earth, and they were made for studying. For whales to become extinct would be a horrible reflection on all of humanity not just the Japanese.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

rebekah


(:ELiZABEtH:)

Most American children watch an average of three to four hours, and most and most of the kids that do watch television get influenced by the shows that they watch and after there done watching that show they don’t have a good behavior, also most of the shows now a days are violent and that is were the kids get the violence.

The same thing happens to the teenagers, and they also become immune and numb to the horror and violence that they see, for most parents its okay to let there kids be watching the violence from television because they say that violence is the answer to problems.

Some kids try to imitate the violence that they see in the shows that they watch, and just by watching one episode it can increase the aggressiveness on children. Also the parents of the children should pay more attention to the shows that there kid’s watch and they should also watch some shows with them.


~ ♥ Brielle's Revised Eassy ♥ ~

Revised
TV violence should be limited, so kids don't imitate what they see on TV or even in movies. It not just the kid's fault for watching the violence, it's the parent's because they let them watch the violence. Parents need to advise what their child is watching to protect them from the violence.

TV violence needs to be limited. If TV networks could stop showing the violence & inappropriate shows, they can help limit violence with kids. Even if they have to make the violence shows prime time, they should. Kids don't need this influence. When adults watch violence, they know it's not right, but kids are young. They think "Well, it's on TV, so I guess its okay." The truth is, its not.

When kids watch so much violence, they start to get use to seeing it. Since they're seeing innocent people get hurt, after a while they can watch violence without feeling the victim's pain. On shows people sometimes hurt the person to get back at the other person, so kids think violence is the answer to their problems.

Another issue is when kids watch violence, they reenact what they saw. When younger kids watch shows like Power Rangers, they hurt others with some Power Ranger fighting moves. Or when they watch Spiderman, they think people who give them problems should stop bothering them by hurting them. Parents should remind their kids that whats happening during Power Rangers or Spiderman isn't real.

Although, sometimes parent can't control what their child is watching. Sometimes they're at work, so they can't prove that their child was even watching the violence. Another thing is that a show without any violence might have an episode with violence. Sometime parents don't know whats coming. However, parents can stop them from watching the violence by telling their kids they're not allowed to watch those kind of shows & movies. Even if their kid goes to their friend's house to watch a movie, the parent should find out what they're going yo watch to see it's appropriate or not.

In conclusion, parents need to advise what their children are watching. Violence should be limited on TV & movies. If there's anyway to prevent kids from watching violence it should be used.

GENNY'S ESSAY:D

ESSAY


TV violence may be a bad influence for young kids.It can change many things about kids.
Their behavior can change .They can become agressive.They imitate what they see on TV.They could use violence to solve their problems.

Some kids use violence to solve their problems or their issues.Kids think that violence gets rid of their problems or issues.Bou it doesnt it just makes everything worse.

Violence on TV can cause agression.Because some programs on TV are very violent.And kids will see what they see on television.

Violence also causes agression.if you watch too much of it.Like six hours is alot of violence.Kids probaly watch too much of it because there is no adult supervision .Or because there bored but there is better things to do like play outside,play a sport,do exercise or go to the mall.

According to a study TV violence is a bad influence .For young kids to watch.They should always have an adult around.When their watching television.To see what their watching.


sebastian essay

TV violence is a bad influence for kids because kids may do the samething that shows on tv. it can change their behavior and act differently by being more aggressive.

alot of kids fight when they have issues with someone else. thats how they solve problems by fighting. but it gets worse because someone might tell on them and they get in trouble.

It also can probably cause more agression when kids watch loads of tv violence. like 6 to 8 hours it can change them big time

an adult should be with a kid when their watching violence. that way the adults know what their watching

Cassandra-Violence essay

Revised
Is tv violence bad? There are different reasons on how tv violence can be affective. Another reason is how much tv is being watched daily. Also parents having a part in that.

Tv violence can be affective to hildren in different ways. Studies have showed effects on what it can do. Children can become immune to it seeing it as alright to do. And accept it is as ways to solve problems. Watching a certain amount can increase the way kids behave.

Tv being watched to much? Children watch an average of 3 to 4 hours of tv. Most of it being of violent shows. It doesn't have to be where you just watch multiple times of violent shows. Violence being very realistic these days causes kids to have a thought in their minds to copy. It could just take one time and kids are influenced.

Parents also have a role in violence. When nothing is being done about whats being watched then theres a problem. They should be in-control of what their kids are watching. And tell them what they see isn't real.

Although watching a lot of violence on tv, that can cause bad behavior. It may just not be the problem. Kids themselves, who may have problems already too. By watching violent shows it could just increase their behavior even more.

Overall, tv violence is bad and affective to children. To much tv being watched causes problems. But remebering that parents have a part in what their kids watch aswell.

Alexia

Revised
There's different reason's for Tv violence. One reason for Tv violence is it's sometimes not appropriate. Another reason for Tv violence is kids might imitate the violence they see, on Tv.

Tv violence isn't always appropriate. Tv can be powerful on kids, when they watch it and it can affect their behavior. A lot of today's Tv shows have violence. Kids that watch the violence get use to seeing it, and don't really care after a while.

Kids might use the Tv violence. Kids take the violence as a way to solve their problems. Tv violence can cause kids to be aggressive to other people. And kids will copy what they see on Tv.

Tv violence isn't alway's bad. It teaches them what can happen. Parents can tell their kids, that the violence on the show the characters are just acting.

There's different reasons for Tv violence. One reason for Tv violence is it's not alway's appropriate for kids. Another reason for tv violence is kids might use the violence. These are the reasons for Tv violence.

JOHNNY ROUGH DRAFT

i think that tv violence has a negative impact on kids . because most kids watch 3 to 4 hours of tv everyday and its mostly younger kids that watch tv and since theyre growing their thoughts are changing and hundreds of studies say and have proven
that violence on tv is negative problem for the thoughts of young children
and their behaviors change because they become more aggressive and become angry and try to solve their problems with violence like people
on tv like wrestlers and those super heroes and try to

act the same in school because if they see a kid in school
doin something their not supposed and or bullying someone
they try to solve it so
they try to act like heroes and beat them up and then try to solve everything with violence
then they get so used to violence and becomes part of their daily life they become immune and numb to violence
so later on they get in to violent crimes and
you can prevent all that by things like a v chip or just try try to watch your kids and try to always have parent supervion on your children



Ideas_Thesis_Arguments_Evidence_Answer counterargumentsOrganization_Introduction with thesis and arguments_One argument with evidence per paragraph_Conclusion that sums up with call to action_Counter argument(s) answered in separate paragraphWord Choice_Specific words (avoid "good" "bad" "cool"_Varied verbs (not just is, are)Sentence Fluency_Flows_Short and long sentencesVoice_In your own words_Appropriate for audience (written for teachers and students)Conventions (do last)_Capitals_Punctuation_Spelling







Edgar's Essay

Television violence should be taken off the air for many reasons. One of which is that television can influence young kids, either in a negative or positive. Also,because if kids do not comprehend what they see they may begin to immitate it. Lastly,becuase if kids watch too much television, then they may begin to believe what they see even if it is not true.

Television can have a strong influence on kids whether or not if it is positive or negative. I alone do not believe this, over 80% of Americans believe this. THe AACP states that kids that watch more televison are more influnced by others.

Also becuase if kids watch tv that they do not comprehend they may begin to believe what they see even if it is not true.

Brittany persuasive essay draft and revised essay

People kill tiger for their own purpose or to benefit them.They kill tigers for parts of the tigers body.They also kill tigers when they move into the same regions where they are and kill them.Finally people may kill tigers accidentally with no purpose of hurting them.I may only mention three reasons but there a probably a whole lot more reasons to why people kill tigers.

Some people kill tigers for parts of their body like their teeth,fur,bones,and more .One reason why people kill tigers for their body is so they sell whatever they take from the tiger and get a lot of money.Another reason people kill tigers for parts of their body is for tigers fur to put on/in clothes to keep people warm.The final reason people kill tigers this way is to sell what they take on the black market for traditional Chinese medicines.People may say well we use their fur for warmth and it looks better than regular wool from a sheep.Yes we do use their fur for warmth and it does look better but when we take the wool from a sheep we don't kill it and it will grow back but when we kill a tiger you only get one use out of it.

People may also kill tigers when they move into the same regions as them and kill them.One reason this happens is people kill them out of a misguided belief that the tiger might hurt them while its looking for prey.Another reason is that people might kill them out of revenge because something could have happened or they just don't like them.The final reason this happens is when they move they need to make room so they cut down the tigers homes so their forced to go live somewhere else where they aren't adapted to and end up dying from a change of territory.People kill tigers this way with a whole lot of other ways that people kill them

People may also kill tigers when they are hunting for other animals like deer and other animals that people hunt.One reason this happens is the tiger will be hunting for prey and sees the bait that is set and the tiger gos for the bait and dies for being a hungry animal.Another reason that this happens is a tiger is chasing its prey runs over a trap and gets caught.The final reason is they get killed accidentally is if its harmlessly walking around when someone might see them and kill them out of fear.This is just another way that people kill tigers and their are still a lot more than this.

People kill tigers no matter what the reason is and they shouldn't because its very mean.People are killing tigers and few people really care about it.They probably think tigers are just wild animals and I shouldn't care if people kill them their not my business.People should care because if not people in the future will not be able to see them unless they see a picture of it or here about them.Plus killing tigers is illegal wherever you are.Thats why people should never kill tigers.



What I need to revise:
I need a new thesis
Reword arguments
Fix conclusion to each paragraph



Revised Essay


Why should people kill tigers for their own benefit?People kill tigers for parts of body like their teeth or their fur.People also kill tigers when they move into the same regions as them.Finally people may kill the tigers accidentally while they are hunting.I may only mention three reasons but there are probably a lot more reasons to why people kill tigers

Some people kill tigers for parts of their body like their teeth,fur,bones,and even more.One reason why people kill tigers is to sell what they take from the tiger for a lot of money.Another reason is people kill tigers for parts of their body is to use the tigers fur to keep them warm when it gets cold.The final reason people kill tigers this way is so they can sell what they take from the tiger and sell it on the black market for traditional medicines.People probably say well we use the parts from the tiger to benefit us so we should keep killing them.Well yeah it does benefit us but other animals that we already kill benefit us so we don't need to kill any more animals then we already do.That's why people shouldnt kill tigers for their own benefit.

People kill tigerswhen they move into the same regions as themand kill them.One reason why people kill tigers this way is they have a misguided belief that the tigers are going to harm them in some way.Another reason this happens is people want revenge on the tigers for being there and thinking their going to hurt them.The final reason this happens is they have to cut down the tigers home to make room for new houses and are forced to move to a new place and die from not knowing the new place.The tigers dont deserve to die but they do because people keep killing them.

People may also kill tigers when they are hunting for other animals people normally hunt like a deer which would then make killing them an accident.One reason this happens is the tiger is hunting sees the bait and goes to the trap,gets caught and dies from hunger or thirst.Another reason why tigers die this way is when a tiger walks, or runs over a set trap and gets caught and eventually dies from either hunger or thirst.The last reason why tigers die this way is if someone is hunting sees the tiger walkiing around harmlessly and kill them out of fear of getting injured.People may not mean it but it still hapopens which i dont think is fair to the tigers or anyone who likes tigers so when people hunt they should be more careful on what they kill or maybe thye shouold stop hunting all together.

Some people kill tigers for their own weird reason or to bene fit them in some way.People are killing tigers and nobodys really doing anything whether the killings are on purpose or an accident.People probably think well there just wild animals so why should I care.People should care because some tiger species are already endangered and soon there will be no more tigers and the only way people will be able to see a tiger is in a picture or picturing what other people say they look like.Thats why people should start caring about tigers more or else nobody will ever get to see a tiger again.

Julie lynne Violence Essay

Violence on the small screen is unexeptable. Televisoin is a major in flunce for kids. It is also influences people to commit crimes.
Televison majorly influces kids. Studies by the AACP shows the effects, including becoming immune to violence and imitating the violence.
Violece on television can influence people to commit crimes. Studies show 44% of shows cotion volence. That’s not good.
Some might say that the fist Andement protects violence onscreen. But even the fist andment has limits.



As early as 1952, the United States House of Representatives was holding hearings to explore the impact of television violence and concluded that the "television broadcast industry was a perpetrator and a deliverer of violence." In 1972 the Surgeon General's office conducted an overview of existing studies on television violence and concluded that it was "a contributing factor to increases in violent crime and antisocial behavior." In his testimony to the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Communications, Surgeon General Jesse Steinfeld said, ""It is clear to me that the causal relationship between televised violence and antisocial behavior is sufficient to warrant appropriate and immediate remedial action… There comes a time when the data are sufficient to justify action. That time has come."
The average child spends 25 hours a week watching television, more time than they spend in school or engaged in any other activity except sleep. It influences them.
Violent entertainment leaves a mark, even on children who don't engage in aggressive behaviors. Witnessing repeated violent acts increases general feelings of hostility and can lead to desensitization and a lack of empathy for human suffering. Over time, consumption of violence-laden imagery can leave viewers with the perception that they are living in a mean and dangerous world, giving them an unrealistically dark view of life. t is estimated that by the time an average child leaves elementary school, he or she will have witnessed 8,000 murders and over 100,000 other acts of violence. verall, violence increased in every time slot between 1998 and 2002. On all the networks combined, violence was 41% more frequent during the 8:00 p.m. (ET/PT) Family Hour in 2002 than in 1998. Nearly 2 out of 3 TV programs contained some violence, averaging about 6 violent acts per hour.
In conclusion, please help stop violence on TV.

Anzueth- t.v. violence essay

Draft

Today many children watch 3 to 4 hours of violence on television. Hundreds of studies prove that kids become immune to t.v violence. Watching t.v violence makes kids more aggressive. finally a majority of people think that t.v violence is a part the humor and it is easier to understand.

Studies proved that kids become immune to t.v violence. By watching and playing violent games/ shows kids have no sort of feeling when they see someone get shot or an arm being broken. They imitate the violence on t.v or certain characters.

Watching t.v violence makes kids more of a greater aggressiveness. Sometimes watching one single violent t.v show can instantly make a kid more aggressive. We need to watch what they are watching on the television. Because if we don't then it could affect their adulthood.

A majority of people think that t.v violence is a part of humor and it's easier to understand. That is not true, many kids and young adults are vulnerable to the violence on the screen.

In the end t.v violence affects children and young adults today.





Revised
Today many children watch 3 to 4 hours of violence on TV. Hundreds of studies prove that kids become immune to t.v violence. Watching violent tv can make kids more aggressive. Finally a majoriy of people think that tv violence is a part of humor and and it's easier to understand .

Studies prove that kids become immune to tv violence by watching and playing intense and bloody games , shows and movies. kids don't feel grossed out when they see someone breaking a bone or getting shot. They immitate the gross acts and characters on the television.

watching tv violence makes kids have more aggressivness . Sometimes watching one single violent tv show can instantly make a child more aggressive. We need watch what they are watching on t.v . becuase if we don't then it could affect their adult hood.

A majority of people think that television violence is a part og the humor and that it is easier to understand. however that is not true, many kids and young adults are vulnerable to the violence on the screen.

In the end t.v violence affects children and young adults today . Although many people think it is part of the comedy. It is not, and your children shouldn't be watching it.

Alexia

Draft
There's different reasons for Tv violence. One reason for Tv violence is it's bad. A second reason for Tv violence is kids use it.

Tv violence is bad. Tv can be powerful on kids with their behavior. A lot of todays Tv shows have violence. Kids that watch the violence get use to seeing it.

Kids use the Tv violence. Kids take the violence as a way to solve problems. Tv violence ca cause kids to be aggressive to other people. And kids will copy what they see on Tv.

Tv violence isn't always bad. It teaches themk what can happen. Parents can tell their kids the violence on the show the characters are just acting.

There's different reason's for Tv violence. One reason for Tv violence is it's bad. A second reason for Tv violence is kids use the violence. Those are the reason's for Tv violence.

Cassandra- Violence essay

Draft
Is tv violence bad? There are different reasons on how tv violence can be affective. Another reason is how tv is being watched daily.

Tv violence can be affective to children id different ways. Studies have showed effects on what it can do. Children can become immune to it seeing it as being alright to do. And accepting it as ways to fix problems. Watching a certain amount can increase the way kids behave. Parents also have a role in violence, when nothing is being done about what's being watched then theres a problem.

Tv being watched to much? Children watch an average of 3 to 4 hours of tv. Most of it being violent shows. It doesn't have to be where you just watch multiple times of violence. It could just take one time and kids are inflluenced

Although watching a lot of violence on tv. It may just not be the problem. Kids themselves, who may have problems already. By watching violent shows it could just increase their behavior even more.

Overall, tv violence is bad and affective to children. To much tv being watched causes problems aswell. But remebering that parents have a part in what their kids watch

ELiZAA - PURSUASiVEE ESSAY

In my opinion violence on the television should be limited because safety for kids is a lot more important than pleasure for adults. Children act due to what they see, and T.V violence can lead them to do dangerous things. Other kids have a sensitive mind and very strong imagination, one vivid scene can traumatize them. Other people, adults/kids, don't have complete sanity and watching gory movies can only give an example or idea them. It is argued that parents should be there with their kids when they watch T.V, not the station's responsibility, but parents are very busy people, and they aren't always there to limit what their children see.
It's a fact that kids do what they see and if they saw a possessed , killer child stabbing someone, they would probably think that its okay-that its what kids do. If they see a video game where, usually you have three lives, they would believe that everyone has three lives. There is one case where not too long ago, there was a little boy who shot a little girl because he bugged him and his answer to it all was "I'll see her tomorrow anyways."
"Special" people who cant think like a normal person does, shouldn't watch killer movies because some of these people can be dangerous mostly because they only know how to react violently to begin with. They can be uncontrollable and impulsive; anything can set them off. Some of those people don't know that their "special" and the situation isn't good when they don't have a doctor's supervision, and it gets worse if they see violence on T.V.
There are some very sensitive kids in this world, and they have to be very careful with what they see or hear. Now a days you can find anything on both Television and Internet, when these kids see heads being chopped off and blood flying everywhere, it would probably really scare them. Usually, when your young you have a BIG imagination, and when your walking in the dark alone, they see things that aren't there. Being paranoid can really ruin some one's life, starting out young can ruin some one's childhood too.
People argue that parents are supposed to know what their kids are watching, but parents work, run errands, go grocery shopping, and do a lot of stuff. They don't have time to be watching their kids' every move neither limit what they watch on T.V. The same people say that we all have freedom of speech, and that getting rid of violence limits their creativity. For one thing, they abuse the First Amendment, and the only exception it has is when its dangerous or a threat. Violence is a threat and it is dangerous. They can be creative but they can have limits. We don't have to get rid of violence completely, just not be so gory and bloody.
We should stop violence on T.V because we need to keep the kids safe, out of danger and out of trouble. Everyone is different and they all react differently, that said, we should take care of what they see because you never know what might happen to them, or what they might do. Yes, people have the right to freedom of speech, and yes they have the right to be creative, but everything has its limits, and we have gone way beyond them.